<body> With the Holy Spirit
...PROFILE

Pauline Elaine Teo
Child of God

...Prayers

1) For love and happiness for everone in 2010

2) For those who are the destitute, homeless, suffering, lonely, hungry, angry...

3) Selfless in my love for everyone, especially to my special one

4) For grace to persevere and be faithful in my vocation

...Time


...TAGBOARD



...LINKS

Amelia
Angele
Clement
Chris
Evelyn
Fr. Aloysius
Fei Ting
Ferdinand
Fonz
Felicia
Gavin
Holly
Jac
Kelly
Kuzzin
Leann
Lloyd
Marcus
Mark Sebastian
Monkey Marion
Nicole
Paul
Petrina
Phae-1
Pris
Sury
Shelly


...ARCHIVES
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • June 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • January 2010
  • March 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • October 2010

  • ...CREDITS
    Blogskins
    Virtual Library
    OLPS homepage
    SACCRE Youth
    Online Bible

    Thursday, March 15, 2007


    Researching on Sexual Evolution for my thesis....

    Why, in spite of trends towards slimness or plumpness, are men attracted to curvaceous "hourglass" feminine figures, while women generally prefer broad shouldered T-shaped male physiques?

    Based on evolutionary theory, then it should not be surprising that men find visual cues to attractiveness more relevant in selecting a mate than women do. As Donald Symons, a University of California anthropologist tells us, this makes sense, since a greater proportion of women’s traditional reproductive mate value can be assessed visually. The clearest feminine cue to fertility is the curving contours created by the contrast between waist and hips. This fat carried in the hips and thighs which creates feminine curves represent the stored calories needed by the mature female to sustain a pregnancy. Interestingly, men presented with silhouettes of women of various heights and weights and asked to choose the most sexually attractive, consistently selected those with an hour-glass shape. Surprisingly, this shape preference even superseded preferences related to apparent plumpness or slimness. Interestingly, scientists have found that female reproductive capacity shows a positive correlation with the sharp contrast between waist and hips of this figure type. Preferred female facial features; wide-set large eyes, small nose and jaw; are imitative of youth and untapped reproductive potential. Similarly, the muscular, angular T-shaped male figure, assertive behaviors, and deep voice most universally preferred by women, are visually indicative of higher levels of the male hormone testosterone (Cowley, 1996).


    Ahhh. Ok... I may not have an ideal 34.24.36 hourglass figure by Asian standards, or the 36.24.36 hourglass figure by the American Pop culture standards cuz I'm one or 2 inches off em, esp at the waist and the hips...(BY THE WAY, neither do all males have perfect T-shaped, muscular figures. Cross my heart, never lie, poke a needle in my eye, I am 101% sure of that!) but oh well...that doesn't make us all losers righto? Heh. A critical me will prefer the notion that humans based on primitive instincts will prefer this physical sexual characteristics, BUT those who put their emotional (feelings), mental(thinking), into good and wonderful use, will beg to differ. HA!


    Hourglass huh!

    There must a conspiracy going on to eliminate all flat-chested, or too well-endowed, stick-like or too fleshy women...Oh!

     -Yours truly ;